01
Data quality
The challengeA data layer, referential included, is only as good as what flows into it. Errors not caught on the way in reach the agent as facts.
In the StarQube platformAutomated quality checks, resolution rules and exception handling validate every value before any agent uses it.
02
Semantic correctness
The challenge"What is our exposure to this company?" means resolving parent companies, subsidiaries, multiple identifiers and fund look-through. Without that structure, an agent guesses from table names — plausibly, and wrong.
In the StarQube platformA unified referential resolves every entity, in any asset class, to a single identity, and every field is documented and defined. An agent always knows exactly what it is looking at.
03
Temporal correctness
The challengeVendors restate their data. An agent working with today's values uses information nobody had at the time: the backtest looks excellent, but the live strategy underperforms.
In the StarQube platformNative point-in-time history, vendor restatements included, so research, backtests, reporting and agents all run on data as it was known at the time.
04
Governed access
The challengeVendor licences restrict which data may be used by an AI model or leave your firm, and regulators expect you to reconstruct the inputs behind any decision. Both require permissions and lineage at field level, not at database level.
In the StarQube platformGranular permissions by data field: an agent never sees more than the person (or process) using it is allowed to see. And lineage from raw vendor value to trade order can be found live, not in an overnight report.